Which document confirms the difference between water consumption and sanitation?

Good evening. I don’t understand where you got these numbers from, although I googled and really found supposedly legislative, muffled calculations with a reasonable difference of 10-20% on some resources. I will say this, in the documents I studied, such specific data are not officially recorded. This is just an example in the preparation of balance sheets for water consumption and sanitation.

BWV is a calculation of the organization of consumed, discharged water indicators and the ratio between them. Since it can be irretrievable losses (for feed / drinking livestock, watering, etc.) or vice versa, the amount of water also received from outside, brought in, brought in, stormwater, etc., makes a reasonable difference of about 10-20%, although this may be a different percentage. Enterprises compile such a report.

So, for example, the subscriber, most often an enterprise or a farm, is connected to a central storm sewer. Surface wastewater is not a separate object of water disposal. This is a general concept that combines both sewage and storm water. What documents such as:

1. Federal Law dated 07.12.2011 No. 416-ФЗ “On Water Supply and Sanitation”.
2. The rules of cold water supply and sanitation approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of July 29, 2013 No. 644 (hereinafter - the Regulation No. 644).
3. The rules for the organization of commercial accounting of water, wastewater, approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 04.09.2013 No. 776 (hereinafter - the Regulation No. 776).

Consequently, the subscriber also pays for these drains if they are included in the drainage agreement concluded with the organization.

An ordinary subscriber, an individual, pays one of the possible points:

1. At the established average tariff.
2. According to the meter of the wastewater meter.
3. According to the calculations of summing the readings of the meters of the received hot water and hot water (if the water heating is not autonomous), multiplied by the tariff established by the contract for sewage + common house in mcd.

I know that there were daredevils trying to find a loophole in the law and challenge the commonality of the concepts of drainage, sewage and home drainage systems, supposedly in the codes these concepts contradict the definition of drainage as a whole, and, therefore, it is an opportunity to pay nothing. I’ve even seen resources that urge communal services to argue, but this is impractical, everything is correctly planned and there.

By the way, a couple of years ago my friends guessed such a supposedly real case. I don’t know whether it was true or not, I can’t say. But, it seems, the woman alone, taking into account the wastewater device, refused to pay the meter because he clocked up a disproportionately higher consumption compared to the supply. I had at that moment (and now) autonomous water consumption, so I guessed how it happened. In addition to the central water supply, she had an autonomous station installed, which she used, since she was satisfied with the quality of the water from there, more than from the water supply. But she led stock to the central issues. Hence the percentage difference.

In general, always read carefully the agreements with resource-supplying organizations and incomprehensible figures will not appear in your receipts.